Effect of a Computer-Based Decision Aid on Knowledge, Perceptions, and Intentions about Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer Susceptibility: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Publication/Presentation Date

7-28-2004

Abstract

CONTEXT: As the availability of and demand for genetic testing for hereditary cancers increases in primary care and other clinical settings, alternative or adjunct educational methods to traditional genetic counseling will be needed.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of a computer-based decision aid with standard genetic counseling for educating women about BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing.

DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted from May 2000 to September 2002.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Outpatient clinics offering cancer genetic counseling at 6 US medical centers enrolled 211 women with personal or family histories of breast cancer.

INTERVENTIONS: Standard one-on-one genetic counseling (n = 105) or education by a computer program followed by genetic counseling (n = 106).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants' knowledge, risk perception, intention to undergo genetic testing, decisional conflict, satisfaction with decision, anxiety, and satisfaction with the intervention. Counselor group measures were administered at baseline and after counseling. Computer group measures were administered at baseline, after computer use, and after counseling. Testing decisions were assessed at 1 and 6 months. Outcomes were analyzed by high vs low risk of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

RESULTS: Both groups had comparable demographics, prior computer experience, medical literacy, and baseline knowledge of breast cancer and genetic testing, and both counseling and computer use were rated highly. Knowledge scores increased in both groups (P

CONCLUSIONS: An interactive computer program was more effective than standard genetic counseling for increasing knowledge of breast cancer and genetic testing among women at low risk of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. However, genetic counseling was more effective than the computer at reducing women's anxiety and facilitating more accurate risk perceptions. These results suggest that this computer program has the potential to stand alone as an educational intervention for low-risk women but should be used as a supplement to genetic counseling for those at high risk.

Volume

292

Issue

4

First Page

442

Last Page

452

ISSN

1538-3598

Disciplines

Medical Sciences | Medicine and Health Sciences

PubMedID

15280342

Department(s)

Department of Community Health and Health Studies, Department of Medicine

Document Type

Article

Share

COinS