Five-year comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of pure aortic stenosis with pure aortic regurgitation or mixed aortic valve disease in the COMMENCE trial.

Publication/Presentation Date

12-1-2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with pure aortic stenosis (Pure AS) and those with pure aortic regurgitation (Pure AR) or mixed AS and AR (MAVD) in the COMMENCE trial.

METHODS: Of 689 patients who underwent AVR in the COMMENCE trial, patients with moderate or severe AR with or without AS (Pure AR + MAVD; n = 135) or Pure AS (n = 323) were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for time-to-event endpoints, and longitudinal changes in hemodynamics were evaluated using mixed-effects models. Echocardiographic outcomes were assessed by an echo core laboratory and clinical outcomes adjudicated by a clinical events committee. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.3 ± 2.2 years.

RESULTS: At 5 years, adjusted safety endpoints were not statistically different between groups; no structural valve deterioration (SVD) event occurred in either group. After adjustment, the Pure AR + MAVD group had a greater change in body surface area-corrected left ventricular (LV) mass reduction (

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Pure AR + MAVD demonstrated similar clinical safety and freedom from SVD at 5 years compared to those with Pure AS. There was a significant difference in LV reverse remodeling in the Pure AR + MAVD group compared to the Pure AS group at 5 years. These favorable outcomes in patients with AR may reinforce the need for treatment before irreversible changes occur.

Volume

22

First Page

160

Last Page

173

ISSN

2666-2736

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

PubMedID

39780838

Department(s)

Department of Surgery

Document Type

Article

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS