Title

The reliability of digital imaging in the remote assessment of wounds: defining a standard.

Publication/Presentation Date

4-1-2006

Abstract

CONTEXT: Telemedicine has been used for remote management of many medical problems. Given the ever-expanding demands to provide increasing service with increasingly limited resources, quality care and practice efficiency can be enhanced by telemedicine.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to explore the reliability of wound assessment using computer-transmitted digital imagery compared with a traditional bedside evaluation and also to assess its potential role in healthcare delivery.

DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS: In the hospital setting, rounding vascular surgeons and a surgical resident evaluated the wounds on the service. A digital photograph was obtained with a 3.3 megapixel camera, and a wound-assessment tool was completed. A plastic surgery attending then reviewed the images at a later date and completed the same data tool.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Wounds were rated for eschar, exposed bone, cellulitis, purulence, swelling, granulation tissue, granulation color, and depth using a standardized data collection tool. kappa statistics were computed for all variables, between raters.

RESULTS: There were 2 phases of the study. In both phases, there was 100% agreement by the rounding physicians that the digital image was representative of the wound. Phase 1 agreement between evaluators was moderate to almost perfect, as demonstrated by kappa values (range, 0.50-0.87). In phase 2, all variable kappa values were rated as almost perfect, except the ability to evaluate depth of the wound to the millimeter, which was rated as substantial.

CONCLUSIONS: The ability to accurately evaluate a wound on the basis of a digital image is possible. However, it requires training of participants and is facilitated by use of an assessment tool. With these caveats, evaluation of wounds using digital images is equivalent to bedside examination. This technology can improve practice efficiency, provide needed expertise at remote sites, and is an acceptable alternative method of wound assessment.

Volume

56

Issue

4

First Page

431

Last Page

436

ISSN

0148-7043

Disciplines

Plastic Surgery

PubMedID

16557079

Department(s)

Department of Surgery, Department of Surgery Faculty

Document Type

Article

Share

COinS