A meta-analysis of DaVinci Si versus Xi in colorectal surgery.
Publication/Presentation Date
6-1-2021
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate whether adoption of DaVinci Xi
METHODS: The Pubmed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases were systematically searched. Operating time as well as docking and surgeon console times were the primary endpoints. Conversion and postoperative complication rates were the secondary endpoints.
RESULTS: Six studies totaling 610 patients (320 Si and 290 Xi) were included. Total operating time [MD (95% CI) = 30.553 (15.071, 46.035); p < 0.001], docking time [MD (95% CI) = 4.178 (2.120, 6.235); p < 0.001] and surgeon console time [MD (95% CI) = 17.246 (-0.479, 34.971); p = 0.056] were longer in DaVinci Si
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis found that the adoption of DaVinci Xi
Volume
17
Issue
3
First Page
2222
Last Page
2222
ISSN
1478-596X
Published In/Presented At
Felsenreich, D. M., Gachabayov, M., Karas, J., Rojas, A., Bergamaschi, R., & RoSiX Study Group (2021). A meta-analysis of DaVinci Si versus Xi in colorectal surgery. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 17(3), e2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2222
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
33624433
Department(s)
Department of Surgery
Document Type
Article