Physical Examination Practices of Internal Medicine Residents: A Pilot Study.
Publication/Presentation Date
6-1-2026
Abstract
Background Several foundational studies have demonstrated that Internal Medicine (IM) residency programs undervalue physical examination skills and infrequently provide direct clinical oversight of residents as they perform physical examinations. This lack of prioritization is consequential. While the literature assessing the accuracy and completeness of IM residents' physical examinations is relatively narrow, certain studies have demonstrated worrisome deficiencies in their clinical skills. Methodology In this single-institution, exploratory, survey-based pilot study, we queried how IM residents perform examinations and their opinions of their own abilities and the adequacy of their training. Results Our most critical findings were that nearly all residents (98.3%) examined patients while they were fully clothed and 42.1% believed that such examinations were "adequate and accurate." Only around half (51.7%) of respondents reported that supervising physicians routinely return to the examination room with them, and nearly 90% said they are rarely provided beside instruction. While a large majority felt that physical examinations help them develop differential diagnoses and diagnose their patients' conditions, only 58.2% felt confident in their examination skills. Conclusions We hope that this preliminary work will lead to collaborations with other training programs in an effort to better understand the state of IM residents' clinical training.
Volume
18
Issue
6
First Page
110721
Last Page
110721
ISSN
2168-8184
Published In/Presented At
Zaid, J., Ojeda, J., Boyle, E., Henry, C., Powell, R., Capron, M., & Stillman, M. (2026). Physical Examination Practices of Internal Medicine Residents: A Pilot Study. Cureus, 18(6), e110721. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.110721
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
42438616
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article