Assessing Postoperative Recovery With Volatile Gas Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Publication/Presentation Date
6-1-2023
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To determine if there is a recovery time difference between patients with and without obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) when using total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) compared to volatile gas inhalational anesthesia.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: OSA and Non-OSA patients were identified at a tertiary institution between January 2019 and November 2020. Non-OSA patients were defined as those who have not been formerly diagnosed with OSA. A modified STOP-BANG score (MSBS) was performed to screen Non-OSA patients for OSA. Recovery was measured by Phase I recovery time, or time it took a patient to reach ≥9/10 on the Aldrete scoring system.
RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were included with 142 in the OSA cohort (59 TIVA, 83 inhalational anesthesia) and 192 in the Non-OSA cohort (119 TIVA, 73 inhalational anesthesia). In OSA patients, there was a 41.29-minute recovery time reduction when using TIVA versus sevoflurane (
CONCLUSIONS: When utilizing TIVA over inhalational anesthesia, patients with OSA have significantly increased benefit in terms of reduced Phase I recovery times as compared to Non-OSA patients.
Volume
132
Issue
6
First Page
667
Last Page
673
ISSN
1943-572X
Published In/Presented At
Sagalow, E. S., Stewart, M., Estephan, L., Rodin, J., Ananth, A., Curcio, B., Krein, H., Heffelfinger, R., Thaler, A., Hunt, P., Boon, M., & Huntley, C. (2023). Assessing Postoperative Recovery With Volatile Gas Versus Total Intravenous Anesthesia in Patients With and Without Obstructive Sleep Apnea. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology, 132(6), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894221112501
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
35833578
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article