Partial versus radical nephrectomy for complex renal mass: multicenter comparative analysis of functional outcomes (Rosula collaborative group).

Publication/Presentation Date

8-1-2023

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Utility of partial nephrectomy (PN) for complex renal mass (CRM) is controversial. We determined the impact of surgical modality on postoperative renal functional outcomes for CRM.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a multicenter registry (ROSULA). CRM was defined as RENAL Score 10-12. The cohort was divided into PN and radical nephrectomy (RN) for analyses. Primary outcome was development of de-novo estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)< 45 mL/min/1.73 m

RESULTS: We analyzed 969 patients (RN=429/PN=540; median follow-up 24.0 months). RN patients had lower BMI (P< 0.001) and larger tumor size (P< 0.001). Overall postoperative complication rate was higher for PN (P< 0.001), but there was no difference in major complications (Clavien III-IV; P=0.702). MVA demonstrated age (HR=1.05, P< 0.001), tumor-size (HR=1.05, P=0.046), RN (HR=2.57, P< 0.001), and BMI (HR=1.04, P=0.001) to be associated with risk for de-novo eGFR< 60 mL/min/1.73 m

CONCLUSIONS: PN provides functional benefit in selected patients with CRM without significant increase in major complications compared to RN, and should be considered when technically feasible.

Volume

75

Issue

4

First Page

425

Last Page

433

ISSN

2724-6442

Disciplines

Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods

PubMedID

37530659

Department(s)

Administration and Leadership

Document Type

Article

Share

COinS