Outcomes of patients with acute complicated type B aortic dissections repaired with the Zenith dissection endovascular system compared to aortic stent graft.
Publication/Presentation Date
2-1-2026
Abstract
ObjectivesWe aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System (ZDES; Zenith TX2 Dissection Endovascular Graft with Pro-Form and Zenith Dissection Endovascular Stent), which uses a proximal stent graft along with a distal bare metal stent compared to traditional stent grafts in the repair of acute, complicated Type B Aortic Dissection (AcTBAD).MethodsThis retrospective study reviews the medical charts of 32 patients with AcTBAD repaired at a single urban academic medical center. 16 of these AcTBAD cases were repaired with the ZDES (87.5% male; mean age, 63.1 years), and 16 were repaired with stent grafts (62.5% male; mean age, 60.6 years). Outcomes include 30-day morbidity, false lumen thrombosis and aneurysmal degeneration at 6 months and 1 year, thirty-day and three-year mortality, and freedom from secondary surgical intervention.ResultsTwelve total postoperative adverse events occurred in the ZDES group compared to 37 in the stent graft group (
Volume
34
Issue
1
First Page
24
Last Page
33
ISSN
1708-539X
Published In/Presented At
Habash, N., Saraiya, A., Nooromid, M., Salvatore, D., DiMuzio, P., & Abai, B. (2026). Outcomes of patients with acute complicated type B aortic dissections repaired with the Zenith dissection endovascular system compared to aortic stent graft. Vascular, 34(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381251313600
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
39760704
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article