Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines.
Publication/Presentation Date
4-1-2009
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare national guidelines regarding small for gestational age (SGA).
STUDY DESIGN: Along with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) practice bulletin on abnormal growth, guidelines from England, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were reviewed.
RESULTS: There are no guidelines on SGA from Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guideline agrees with ACOG's definition of abnormal growth, but there are noticeable variances in the diagnosis and management of SGA. RCOG has more recommendations than ACOG (18 vs 4, respectively). The articles referenced varied, with only 13 similar articles being cited by the both committees.
CONCLUSION: The differences in the 2 guidelines suggest that there is variance in how 2 committees synthesize the literature and issue recommendations.
Volume
200
Issue
4
First Page
1
Last Page
6
ISSN
1097-6868
Published In/Presented At
Chauhan, S. P., Gupta, L. M., Hendrix, N. W., Berghella, V., & American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2009). Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 200(4), 409.e1–409.e4096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.025
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
19217594
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article