Hands-and-knees posturing and fetal occiput anterior position: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publication/Presentation Date

7-1-2021

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Persistent occiput posterior and occiput transverse positions are associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess if the use of hands-and-knees posturing increased the rate of occiput anterior position immediately after posturing during the second stage of labor or at the time of birth.

DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed from inception to September 2020.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Eligibility criteria included all randomized controlled trials of singleton gestations at ≥36 weeks' gestation that were randomized to either the hands-and-knees posture group or control group. The primary outcome was a composite of occiput anterior positioning during the second stage of labor or at birth. Individual components of the composite were assessed as secondary outcomes. Additional secondary outcomes were a change to occiput anterior position immediately after the intervention, use of regional anesthesia, duration of labor, mode of delivery, third- or fourth-degree perineal laceration, neonatal birthweight, and Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes.

METHODS: The methodological quality of all the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A meta-analysis was performed using the random effects model of DerSimmonian and Laird to produce a summary of the treatment effects in terms of relative risk or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS: Of the 1079 studies screened, 5 met the inclusion criteria (n=1727 hands-and-knees posture vs n=1641 controls). When compared with the control group, patients who adopted the hands-and-knees posture had the same rate of occiput anterior positioning in the second stage of labor or at birth (81.2% vs 81.2%; relative risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.14), as well as immediately after the intervention (34.1% vs 18.0%; relative risk, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.90). On the basis of the post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with an ultrasound-diagnosed malposition before posturing, there was a higher rate of occiput anterior positioning immediately after the intervention (17.0% vs 10.3%; relative risk, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.52), but this relationship did not persist at delivery. The remainder of the subgroup analyses and secondary outcomes were not significant.

CONCLUSION: Adopting a hands-and-knees posture does not increase the rate of occiput anterior positioning at time of delivery.

Volume

3

Issue

4

First Page

100346

Last Page

100346

ISSN

2589-9333

Disciplines

Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods

PubMedID

33705998

Department(s)

Administration and Leadership

Document Type

Article

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS