One-step vs 2-step gestational diabetes mellitus screening and pregnancy outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Publication/Presentation Date
5-1-2024
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes of patients screened with the 1-step or 2-step screening method for gestational diabetes mellitus.
DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and LILACS were searched from inception up to September 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only randomized controlled trials were included. Studies that had overlapping populations were excluded (International Prospective Register of Systematic Review registration number: CRD42022358903).
METHODS: Risk ratios were computed with 95% confidence intervals by 2 authors. Unpublished data were requested. Large for gestational age was the primary outcome.
RESULTS: The search yielded 394 citations. Moreover, 7 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. A total of 54,650 participants were screened for gestational diabetes mellitus by either the 1-step screening method (n=27,163) or the 2-step screening method (n=27,487). For large for gestational age, there was no significant difference found between the groups (risk ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.05; I
CONCLUSION: Large for gestational age did not differ between patients screened using the 1-step screening method and those screened using the 2-step screening method. However, patients randomized to the 1-step screening method had higher rates of neonatal hypoglycemia and neonatal intensive care unit admission and maternal gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis than the patients randomized to the 2-step screening method.
Volume
6
Issue
5
First Page
101346
Last Page
101346
ISSN
2589-9333
Published In/Presented At
Gomes, C., Futterman, I. D., Sher, O., Gluck, B., Hillier, T. A., Ramezani Tehrani, F., Chaarani, N., Fisher, N., Berghella, V., & McLaren, R. A., Jr (2024). One-step vs 2-step gestational diabetes mellitus screening and pregnancy outcomes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 6(5), 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101346
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
38479488
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article