Safety and Outcomes of EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy in Patients with a Common Bile Duct Diameter ≤15 mm.

Publication/Presentation Date

11-5-2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) using lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) is an established biliary drainage strategy after failed ERCP, but deployment in extrahepatic bile ducts (≤15 mm) may increase technical risk. We evaluated outcomes and factors associated with stent misdeployment (SMD), dysfunction, and adverse events in this subgroup.

METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 14 tertiary centers of adults undergoing EUS-CDS with cautery-enhanced LAMS in extrahepatic bile ducts ≤15 mm between 2014 and 2025. Prespecified multivariable logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed.

RESULTS: Among 192 patients, 95.3% had malignant biliary obstruction; median bile duct diameter was 14.0 mm (IQR 12.0-14.9). Technical and clinical success were 91.7% and 90.1%, respectively. SMD occurred in 20 patients (10.4%), most commonly type I (80.0%). No lower duct-caliber threshold independently predicted technical failure or SMD. Two-step deployment had a lower unadjusted SMD rate than one-step deployment (3.3% vs 13.7%; P=0.039), but adjusted odds of SMD were lower without reaching statistical significance (aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.05-1.16; P=0.076). Duodenal obstruction independently predicted stent dysfunction (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.02-4.99; P=0.044) and shorter dysfunction-free patency. LAMS ≥8 mm was independently associated with fewer adverse events (aOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98; P=0.045).

CONCLUSIONS: EUS-CDS in bile ducts ≤15 mm achieved high technical success but carried an approximately 10% SMD risk. Two-step deployment was associated with fewer observed SMDs, whereas duodenal obstruction predicted later dysfunction. Larger-caliber LAMS was associated with fewer adverse events. These findings warrant prospective validation.

ISSN

1097-6779

Disciplines

Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods

PubMedID

42988125

Department(s)

Administration and Leadership

Document Type

Article

Share

COinS