A Cautionary Tale: Exploring Stakeholder Emotions During Curricular Change Using Group Concept Mapping.
Publication/Presentation Date
1-1-2023
Abstract
PhenomenonCurricular change is essential but challenging. Change efforts often struggle and some fail due to well-articulated challenges as well as other barriers less understood. The curricular change literature characterizes the organizational and operational features of successful change yet virtually ignores stakeholder emotions. A deeper understanding of these emotional responses during the change process could enhance participant and organizational well-being and support change success. Approach In 2019, data were collected at one large North American medical school using group concept mapping methodology, an asynchronous mixed methods approach. We sought to generate themes characterizing the emotional responses of faculty, administrative staff, and students across multiple stakeholder groups participating in the new and traditional (legacy) curricula 27 months after curricular change initiation. Participants brainstormed, sorted, and rated statements on emotional responses. Rating participants rated each statement using a Likert scale from 1 (does not resonate) to 4 (very strongly resonates) according to this prompt: "This emotional response resonates with my emotional experience during the curricular change." Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analyses were used to generate emotional profiles and compare them across stakeholders. Findings Of 335 stakeholders invited, 123 contributed to brainstorming (36.7%), 153 completed rating (45.7%) and 33 completed sorting (9.9%). Participants generated six themes of emotional responses to curricular change:
Volume
35
Issue
1
First Page
10
Last Page
20
ISSN
1532-8015
Published In/Presented At
Ziring, D., Powell, R., Vaid, U., Nord, G., L'Etoile, N., & Herrine, S. (2023). A Cautionary Tale: Exploring Stakeholder Emotions During Curricular Change Using Group Concept Mapping. Teaching and learning in medicine, 35(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2021.2017942
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
35068284
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article