Lumbar decompression using a traditional midline approach versus a tubular retractor system: comparison of patient-based clinical outcomes.

Authors

• D Greg Anderson
• Amar Patel
• Mitchell Maltenfort
• Alexander R Vaccaro
• John Ratliff
• Alan Hilibrand
• James S Harrop
• Ashwini D Sharan
• Ravi K Ponnappan
• Jeffrey Rihn
• Todd J Albert

Publication/Presentation Date

3-1-2011

Volume

36

Issue

5

First Page

320

Last Page

325

ISSN

1528-1159

Published In/Presented At

Anderson, D. G., Patel, A., Maltenfort, M., Vaccaro, A. R., Ratliff, J., Hilibrand, A., Harrop, J. S., Sharan, A. D., Ponnappan, R. K., Rihn, J., & Albert, T. J. (2011). Lumbar decompression using a traditional midline approach versus a tubular retractor system: comparison of patient-based clinical outcomes. Spine, 36(5), E320–E325. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181db1dfb

Disciplines

Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods

PubMedID

21178844

Department(s)

Administration and Leadership

Document Type

Article