Upper cervical injuries: Clinical results using a new treatment algorithm.
Publication/Presentation Date
1-1-2015
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Upper cervical injuries (UCI) have a wide range of radiological and clinical presentation due to the unique complex bony, ligamentous and vascular anatomy. We recently proposed a rational approach in an attempt to unify prior classification system and guide treatment. In this paper, we evaluate the clinical results of our algorithm for UCI treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort series of patients with UCI was performed. The primary outcome was the AIS. Surgical treatment was proposed based on our protocol: Ligamentous injuries (abnormal misalignment, facet perched or locked, increase atlanto-dens interval) were treated surgically. Bone fractures without ligamentous injuries were treated with a rigid cervical orthosis, with exception of fractures in the dens base with risk factors for non-union.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients treated initially conservatively had some follow-up (mean of 171 days, range from 60 to 436 days). All of them were neurologically intact. None of the patients developed a new neurological deficit. Fifteen patients were initially surgically treated (mean of 140 days of follow-up, ranging from 60 to 270 days). In the surgical group, preoperatively, 11 (73.3%) patients were AIS E, 2 (13.3%) AIS C and 2 (13.3%) AIS D. At the final follow-up, the American Spine Injury Association (ASIA) score was: 13 (86.6%) AIS E and 2 (13.3%) AIS D. None of the patients had neurological worsening during the follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective cohort suggested that our UCI treatment algorithm can be safely used. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to further establish its clinical validity and safety.
Volume
6
Issue
1
First Page
16
Last Page
20
ISSN
0974-8237
Published In/Presented At
Joaquim, A. F., Ghizoni, E., Tedeschi, H., Yacoub, A. R., Brodke, D. S., Vaccaro, A. R., & Patel, A. A. (2015). Upper cervical injuries: Clinical results using a new treatment algorithm. Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine, 6(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8237.151585
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
25788816
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article