Efficacy of i-Factor Bone Graft versus Autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results of the Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study.

Authors

• Paul M Arnold
• Rick C Sasso
• Michael E Janssen
• Michael G Fehlings
• Joseph D Smucker
• Alexander R Vaccaro
• Robert F Heary
• Ashvin I Patel
• Benoit Goulet
• Iain H Kalfas
• Branko Kopjar

Publication/Presentation Date

7-1-2016

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel, single-blinded noninferiority multicenter pivotal FDA IDE trial.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate efficacy and safety of i-Factor Bone Graft (i-Factor) compared with local autograft in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical radiculopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: i-Factor is a composite bone substitute material consisting of the P-15 synthetic collagen fragment adsorbed onto anorganic bone mineral and suspended in an inert biocompatible hydrogel carrier. P-15 has demonstrated bone healing efficacy in dental, orthopedic, and nonhuman applications.

METHODS: Patients randomly received either autograft (N = 154) or i-Factor (N = 165) in a cortical ring allograft. Study success was defined as noninferiority in fusion, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Neurological Success endpoints, and similar adverse events profile at 12 months.

RESULTS: At 12 months (follow-up rate 87%), both i-Factor and autograft subjects demonstrated a high fusion rate (88.97% and 85.82%, respectively, noninferiority P = 0.0004), significant improvements in NDI (28.75 and 27.40, respectively, noninferiority P <  0.0001), and high Neurological Success rate (93.71% and 93.01%, respectively, noninferiority P <  0.0001). There was no difference in the rate of adverse events (83.64% and 82.47% in the i-Factor and autograft groups, respectively, P = 0.8814). Overall success rate consisting of fusion, NDI, Neurological Success and Safety Success was higher in i-Factor subjects than in autograft subjects (68.75% and 56.94%, respectively, P = 0.0382). Improvements in VAS pain and SF-36v2 scores were clinically relevant and similar between the groups. A high proportion of patients reported good or excellent Odom outcomes (81.4% in both groups).

CONCLUSION: i-Factor has met all four FDA mandated noninferiority success criteria and has demonstrated safety and efficacy in single-level ACDF for cervical radiculopathy. i-Factor and autograft groups demonstrated significant postsurgical improvement and high fusion rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Volume

41

Issue

13

First Page

1075

Last Page

1083

ISSN

1528-1159

Published In/Presented At

Arnold, P. M., Sasso, R. C., Janssen, M. E., Fehlings, M. G., Smucker, J. D., Vaccaro, A. R., Heary, R. F., Patel, A. I., Goulet, B., Kalfas, I. H., & Kopjar, B. (2016). Efficacy of i-Factor Bone Graft versus Autograft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results of the Prospective, Randomized, Single-blinded Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption Study. Spine, 41(13), 1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001466

Disciplines

Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods

PubMedID

26825787

Department(s)

Administration and Leadership

Document Type

Article