Patients With Preoperative Cervical Deformity Experience Similar Clinical Outcomes to Those Without Deformity Following 1-3 Level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

Authors

• Brian A Karamian
• Jennifer Z Mao
• Anthony Viola
• Derek G Ju
• Jose A Canseco
• Gregory R Toci
• Daniel R Bowles
• David M Reiter
• Nicholas C Semenza
• Barrett I Woods
• Joseph K Lee
• Alan S Hilibrand
• I David Kaye
• Christopher K Kepler
• Alexander R Vaccaro
• Gregory D Schroeder

Publication/Presentation Date

6-1-2022

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare the outcomes of patients with incompletely corrected cervical deformity against those without deformity following short-segment anterior cervical decompression and fusion for clinically significant radiculopathy or myelopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical deformity has increasingly been recognized as a driver of disability and has been linked to worse patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after surgery.

METHODS: Patients 18 years or above who underwent 1-3 level anterior cervical decompression and fusion to address radiculopathy and/or myelopathy at a single institution between 2014 and 2018 with at least 1 year of PROMs were reviewed. Patients were categorized based on cervical deformity into 2 groups: sagittal vertebral axis (cSVA) ≥40 mm as the deformity group, and cSVA < 40 mm as the nondeformity group. Patient demographics, surgical parameters, preoperative and postoperative radiographs, and minimum 1-year PROMs were compared.

RESULTS: Of the 230 patients, 191 (83%) were in the nondeformity group and 39 (17%) in the deformity group. Patients with deformity were more likely to be male (69.2% vs. 40.3%, P< 0.001) and have a greater body mass index (32.8 vs. 29.7, P=0.028). The deformity group had significantly greater postoperative cSVA (44.2 vs. 25.1 mm, P< 0.001) but also had significantly greater ∆cSVA (-4.87 vs. 0.25 mm, P=0.007) than the nondeformity group. Both groups had significant improvements in visual analog scale arm, visual analog scale neck, Short-Form 12 Physical Component Score, and neck disability index (NDI) (P< 0.001). However, the deformity group experienced significantly greater ∆NDI and ∆mental component score (MCS)-12 scores (-19.45 vs. -11.11, P=0.027 and 7.68 vs. 1.32, P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with preoperative cervical sagittal deformity experienced relatively greater improvements in NDI and MCS-12 scores than those without preoperative deformity. These results suggest that complete correction of sagittal alignment is not required for patients to achieve significant clinical improvement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Volume

35

Issue

5

First Page

466

Last Page

466

ISSN

2380-0194

Published In/Presented At

Karamian, B. A., Mao, J. Z., Viola, A., 3rd, Ju, D. G., Canseco, J. A., Toci, G. R., Bowles, D. R., Reiter, D. M., Semenza, N. C., Woods, B. I., Lee, J. K., Hilibrand, A. S., Kaye, I. D., Kepler, C. K., Vaccaro, A. R., & Schroeder, G. D. (2022). Patients With Preoperative Cervical Deformity Experience Similar Clinical Outcomes to Those Without Deformity Following 1-3 Level Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion. Clinical spine surgery, 35(5), E466–E472. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001291

Disciplines

Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods

PubMedID

34923501

Department(s)

Administration and Leadership

Document Type

Article