Tissue response to surgical energy devices.
Publication/Presentation Date
4-1-2008
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is little data available on the effects of energy-based surgical devices (ESD) on tissues other than arteries and veins. As such, we quantified the lateral thermal damage associated with contemporary ESD: the Harmonic ACE, a prototype bipolar device known as the Gyrus Trisector, the Harmonic LCS-C5, and the LigaSure V.
METHODS: We divided 24 domestic pigs into 4 groups, 1 group for each ESD tested. Segments of bladder, stomach, small bowel, colon, ureter, peritoneum, arteries, and veins were exposed to each ESD. The tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and evaluated by an experienced pathologist to quantitate the lateral energy spread associated with each device. We measured blade temperatures of each device using the IR-Flex thermal camera.
RESULTS: The Trisector developed the lowest mean blade temperature (97.84 degrees F), whereas the LigaSure's was the second lowest (103.14 degrees F). The ACE and LCS-C5 created the highest blade temperatures, measuring 220.5 degrees F and 205.6 degrees F, respectively. The Trisector's mean full thickness and superficial lateral energy damage were 6.3 mm and 7.0 mm, respectively, whereas the Ligasure's was 4.5 mm and 5.9 mm, respectively. For the ACE, however, mean full thickness and superficial energy spread were 2.4 mm and 2.8 mm, respectively, whereas the LCS-C5's were 3.1 mm and 4.3 mm, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The Harmonic ACE and LCS-C5 produced the least thermal damage in the tissues tested. ESD-associated tissue energy damage is not directly related to blade temperature, but is likely the result of several factors including blade temperature, transection time, tissue properties, and the vascularity of each transected tissue.
Volume
71
Issue
4
First Page
744
Last Page
748
ISSN
1527-9995
Published In/Presented At
Phillips, C. K., Hruby, G. W., Durak, E., Lehman, D. S., Humphrey, P. A., Mansukhani, M. M., & Landman, J. (2008). Tissue response to surgical energy devices. Urology, 71(4), 744–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.11.035
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
18289646
Department(s)
Department of Medicine
Document Type
Article