Outcomes of nighttime refusal of admission to the intensive care unit: The role of the intensivist in triage.
Publication/Presentation Date
6-1-2017
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of patients refused medical intensive care unit (MICU) admission overnight to those refused during the day and to examine the impact of the intensivist in triage.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational study of patients refused MICU admission at an urban university hospital.
RESULTS: Of 294 patients, 186 (63.3%) were refused admission overnight compared to 108 (36.7%) refused during the day. Severity-of-illness by the Mortality Probability Model was similar between the two groups (P=.20). Daytime triage refusals were more likely to be staffed by an intensivist (P=.01). After risk-adjustment, daytime refusals had a lower odds of subsequent ICU admission (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.95, P=.04) than patients triaged at night. There was no evidence for interaction between time of triage and intensivist staffing of the patient (P=.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients refused MICU admission overnight are more likely to be later admitted to an ICU than patients refused during the day. However, the mechanism for this observation does not appear to depend on the intensivist's direct evaluation of the patient. Further investigation into the clinician-specific effects of ICU triage and identification of potentially modifiable hospital triage practices will help to improve both ICU utilization and patient safety.
Volume
39
First Page
214
Last Page
219
ISSN
1557-8615
Published In/Presented At
Hinds, N., Borah, A., & Yoo, E. J. (2017). Outcomes of nighttime refusal of admission to the intensive care unit: The role of the intensivist in triage. Journal of critical care, 39, 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.12.024
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
28279496
Department(s)
Department of Medicine
Document Type
Article