Hepatitis B prevalence in an unregistered prenatal population. Implications for neonatal therapy.
Publication/Presentation Date
11-27-1991
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk and associated cofactors for hepatitis B infection in inner-city pregnant women not registered for prenatal care.
DESIGN: Fifteen-month survey of 208 patients not registered for prenatal care, compared with 1555 women registered for prenatal care during the same period.
SETTING: An urban university hospital prenatal clinic and labor unit.
RESULTS: Unregistered patients had a significantly higher rate of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity than patients who had registered with the clinic (6.7% vs 0.8%; P less than .0001). Unregistered patients with positive results of urine drug screening (46%) had a relative risk for seropositivity of 29.2%, compared with registered patients who did not have histories of illicit drug use (95% confidence interval, 25.9% to 32.4%), while registered patients with past histories of drug use had a relative risk of 6.7%, compared with the reference group that did not have histories of drug use (95% confidence interval, 1.8% to 24.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Among inner-city pregnant women not registered for prenatal care, a positive result of urine drug screening is a rapidly available marker for increased risk of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity. Infants born to unregistered women with positive results of urine drug screening before maternal hepatitis B surface antigen results are available may warrant empiric initiation of hepatitis B virus-specific prophylaxis.
Volume
266
Issue
20
First Page
2852
Last Page
2855
ISSN
0098-7484
Published In/Presented At
Silverman, N. S., Darby, M. J., Ronkin, S. L., & Wapner, R. J. (1991). Hepatitis B prevalence in an unregistered prenatal population. Implications for neonatal therapy. JAMA, 266(20), 2852–2855.
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
1834870
Department(s)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Document Type
Article