PACS in sonography: accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display. Picture archiving and communication systems.
Publication/Presentation Date
11-1-1999
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the relative accuracy of interpretation of sonography when viewed on a monitor or on film.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four radiologists twice interpreted a series of 440 sonograms using the following sequences of display formats for initial and second interpretations: film-film, film-monitor, monitor-film, and monitor-monitor. Reporting discrepancies between the initial and subsequent interpretation were reviewed by an arbitration panel unaware of the display mode. Results were analyzed for differences in error rate attributable to film versus monitor display format, chronology of interpretation, individual observer, and observer seniority.
RESULTS: We found no statistically significant difference in the error rate for film (10.3%) versus monitor display format (14.6%) (p = .09). Likewise, we found no significant differences in the error rates attributable to chronology of interpretation (p = .13), individual observer (p = .54), or observer seniority (p = .87).
CONCLUSION: Interpretative accuracy is similar whether sonograms are interpreted on a monitor or on film.
Volume
173
Issue
5
First Page
1175
Last Page
1179
ISSN
0361-803X
Published In/Presented At
Hertzberg, B. S., Kliewer, M. A., Paulson, E. K., Sheafor, D. H., Freed, K. S., Bowie, J. D., Carroll, B. A., DeLong, D. H., & Nelson, R. C. (1999). PACS in sonography: accuracy of interpretation using film compared with monitor display. Picture archiving and communication systems. AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 173(5), 1175–1179. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541084
Disciplines
Diagnosis | Medicine and Health Sciences | Other Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment | Radiology
PubMedID
10541084
Department(s)
Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Medical Imaging
Document Type
Article