Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice.
Publication/Presentation Date
5-1-2005
Abstract
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate whether recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for a group of radiologists who met requirements of Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992 (MQSA) demonstrated any change over time during a 27-month period (nine consecutive calendar quarters).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approved study protocol, and informed consent was waived. All screening mammograms that had been interpreted by MQSA-qualified radiologists between January 1, 2001, and March 31, 2003, were reviewed. Group recall rates, biopsy rates, and detected cancer rates for nine calendar quarters were computed and attributed to performance date of original screening mammogram. Type of biopsy performed was classified as follows: stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy, ultrasonography (US)-guided core biopsy, US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy, surgical excision, and multiple biopsies. chi(2) Test for trend (two sided) and linear regression were used to assess trends over time for recall and biopsy rates, biopsy rates according to type of biopsy performed, and percentage of biopsy results positive for cancer.
RESULTS: Group recall rate did not show a statistically significant trend during period studied (P = .59). Biopsy rates increased significantly from 13.02 to 20.12 per 1000 screening examinations (P < .001). A corresponding substantial decrease was seen in percentage of biopsies in which malignancy was found, although this trend was not statistically significant (P = .24). A significant increase (from 4.72 to 9.88 per 1000 screening examinations) was found in rate of stereotactic vacuum-assisted 11-gauge core biopsies performed (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Observed increase in biopsy rates reinforces the need to carefully select patients for biopsy to achieve efficient, efficacious, and cost-effective programs for early detection of breast cancers.
Volume
235
Issue
2
First Page
396
Last Page
401
ISSN
0033-8419
Published In/Presented At
Gur, D., Wallace, L. P., Klym, A. H., Hardesty, L. A., Abrams, G. S., Shah, R., & Sumkin, J. H. (2005). Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice. Radiology, 235(2), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2352040422
Disciplines
Diagnosis | Medicine and Health Sciences | Other Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment | Radiology
PubMedID
15770039
Department(s)
Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Medical Imaging
Document Type
Article