Induction versus no induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre randomised phase II trial (NCCTG N0849 [Alliance])
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-1-2021
Publication Title
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
E-ISSN
1879-0852
Department(s)
Hematology-Medical Oncology Division
Keywords
Esophageal adenocarcinoma, Gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma, Radiation, Surgery, Trimodality therapy, esophagectomy, nduction chemotherapy
Abstract
AIM: report primary results from the first multicentre randomised trial evaluating induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy in patients with oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Notably, recent data from a single-institution randomised trial reported that induction chemotherapy prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. METHODS: In this phase 2 trial (28 centres in the U.S. NCI-sponsored North Central Cancer Treatment Group [Alliance]), trimodality-eligible patients (TN, TN) were randomised to receive induction (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine; Arm A) or no induction chemotherapy (Arm B) followed by oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/radiation and subsequent surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathologic complete response (pathCR). Secondary/exploratory endpoints were OS and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Of 55 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint, the pathCR rate was 28.6% (8/28) in A versus 40.7% (11/27) in B (P = .34). Given interim results indicating futility, accrual was terminated, but patients were followed. After a median follow-up of 60.4 months, a longer median OS in Arm A versus B was unexpectedly observed (3-year rates 57.1% versus 41.7%, respectively) driven by longer DFS after margin-free surgery. In posthoc analysis, induction (versus no induction) chemotherapy was associated with significantly longer OS and DFS among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours, but not among patients with poorly/undifferentiated tumours (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Adding induction chemotherapy prior to trimodality therapy did not improve the primary endpoint, pathCR. However, induction chemotherapy was associated with longer median OS, particularly among patients with well/moderately differentiated tumours. These findings may inform further development of curative-intent trials in this disease.
Volume
150
First Page
214
Last Page
223
DOI
10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.025
PubMed ID
33934058
Recommended Citation
Yoon, H. H., Ou, F., Soori, G. S., Shi, Q., Wigle, D. A., Sticca, R. P., Miller, R. C., Leenstra, J. L., Peller, P. J., Ginos, B., Heying, E., Wu, T., Drevyanko, T. F., Ko, S., Mattar, B. I., Nikcevich, D. A., Behrens, R. J., Khalil, M., Kim, G. P., & Alberts, S. R. (2021). Induction versus no induction chemotherapy before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a multicentre randomised phase II trial (NCCTG N0849 [Alliance]). LVHN Scholarly Works. Retrieved from https://scholarlyworks.lvhn.org/research-historical-works/58
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.025