USF-LVHN SELECT
Lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis tenotomy repair techniques during total shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of cadaveric studies.
Publication/Presentation Date
12-1-2016
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Numerous techniques have been used to mobilize and repair the subscapularis tendon during total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to perform a detailed comparison of subscapularis tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy repairs during total shoulder arthroplasty.
METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched two databases (PubMed and the Cochrane Library) to find cadaveric studies comparing the biomechanical strength of various subscapularis repair techniques following total shoulder arthroplasty. Articles that compared at least two repair techniques with similar biomechanical methods were included.
FINDINGS: An initial literature search resulted in 145 studies. A title and abstract review resulted in five studies which analyzed outcomes of subscapularis tenotomy (total n=29) or lesser tuberosity osteotomy using a single- or dual-row suture technique (total n=46). Load to failure was significantly higher in the lesser tuberosity osteotomy group (M 443, SD 231N) than the tenotomy group (M 350, SD 113N) (p=0.047). Tenotomy (n=19) and lesser tuberosity osteotomy (n=31) had average cyclic displacements of 1.7mm (SD 1.3) and 2.1mm (SD 1.6), respectively (p=0.34). Mode of failure was significantly different between the two groups (p
INTERPRETATION: Based on current biomechanical data, lesser tuberosity osteotomy is a stronger repair than a subscapularis tenotomy at "time-zero" in terms of load to failure. However, cyclic displacement did not differ statistically between the two techniques.
Volume
40
First Page
33
Last Page
36
ISSN
1879-1271
Published In/Presented At
Schrock, J. B., Kraeutler, M. J., Houck, D. A., Provenzano, G. G., McCarty, E. C., & Bravman, J. T. (2016). Lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis tenotomy repair techniques during total shoulder arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of cadaveric studies. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 40, 33–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.10.013
Disciplines
Medical Education | Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
27816022
Department(s)
USF-LVHN SELECT Program, USF-LVHN SELECT Program Students
Document Type
Article