Main versus segmental hepatic artery angioembolization in patients with traumatic liver injuries: A Western Trauma Association multicenter study.
Publication/Presentation Date
11-8-2024
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hepatic angioembolization is highly effective for hemorrhage control in hemodynamically stable patients with traumatic liver injuries and contrast extravasation. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the specific location of angioembolization within the hepatic arterial vasculature and its implications on patient outcomes.
METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study across 23 centers was performed. Adult patients undergoing main hepatic artery angioembolization or segmental hepatic artery angioembolization within 8 hours of arrival were included. The primary outcome was liver-related complications, defined as perihepatic fluid collection, bile leak/biloma, pseudoaneurysm, hepatic necrosis, and/or hepatic abscess. Secondary outcomes were liver-related complication interventions, length of stay, and mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 55 patients underwent hepatic angioembolization, with 23 (41.8%) undergoing main hepatic artery angioembolization and 32 (58.2%) receiving segmental hepatic artery angioembolization. Both groups were comparable in age, vitals, mechanism of injury, liver injury grade distribution, and injury severity score (all P > .05). The main hepatic artery angioembolization group had greater rates of overall liver-related complications (65.2% vs 31.2%, P = .039), specifically perihepatic fluid collection (26.1% vs 6.3%, P = .040) and bile-leak/biloma (34.8% vs 12.5%, P = .048). Main hepatic artery angioembolization had greater rates of 2 or more liver-related complications (47.8% vs 9.4%, P = .001) and readmission within 30 days (30.4% vs 9.4%, P = .046). No significant differences were observed in hospital length of stay and mortality (all P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Main hepatic artery angioembolization is associated with increased rates of liver-related complications, multiple liver-related complications, and readmission within 30 days compared with segmental hepatic artery angioembolization. Thus, main hepatic artery angioembolization should be reserved for use only when segmental hepatic artery angioembolization is not feasible, albeit with significantly increased morbidity.
ISSN
1532-7361
Published In/Presented At
Nguyen, P. D., Nahmias, J., Aryan, N., Samuels, J. M., Cripps, M., Carmichael, H., McIntyre, R., Jr, Urban, S., Burlew, C. C., Velopulos, C., Ballow, S., Dirks, R. C., Spalding, M. C., LaRiccia, A., Farrell, M. S., Stein, D. M., Truitt, M. S., Grossman Verner, H. M., Mentzer, C. J., Mack, T. J., … Grigorian, A. (2024). Main versus segmental hepatic artery angioembolization in patients with traumatic liver injuries: A Western Trauma Association multicenter study. Surgery, S0039-6060(24)00884-5. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.10.002
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
39521628
Department(s)
Department of Surgery
Document Type
Article