A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing bovine pericardium and other patch materials for carotid endarterectomy.
Publication/Presentation Date
10-1-2018
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy is commonly used to treat symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The objective of the present study was to compare the different patch materials that are currently available (synthetic vs venous vs bovine pericardium) in terms of short- and long-term outcomes.
METHODS: This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and eligible randomized control trials were identified through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central published until September 2017. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of a random effects model. The I
RESULTS: Eighteen studies and 3234 patients were included. The risk of 30-day stroke (relative risk [RR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-2.19; I
CONCLUSIONS: Closure of the carotid arteriotomy with any of the studied patch materials seems to be similar in terms of short- and long-term end points. However, additional randomized trials with adequate follow-up periods are needed to compare bovine pericardium patches with other patch materials.
Volume
68
Issue
4
First Page
1241
Last Page
1256
ISSN
1097-6809
Published In/Presented At
Texakalidis, P., Giannopoulos, S., Charisis, N., Giannopoulos, S., Karasavvidis, T., Koullias, G., & Jabbour, P. (2018). A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing bovine pericardium and other patch materials for carotid endarterectomy. Journal of vascular surgery, 68(4), 1241–1256.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.023
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
30244928
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article