Design, Development, Funding, and Implementation of the CSRS Registry: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Cervical Spine Registry.

Authors

• Julie M Witham
• Rick C Sasso
• Praveen V Mummaneni
• K Daniel Riew
• Zeeshan M Sardar
• Wilson Z Ray
• James S Harrop
• Themistocles Protopsaltis
• Samuel K Cho
• Ahmad Nassr
• Aditya Vedentam
• Addisu Mesfin
• John M Rhee
• Brandon D Lawrence
• Steven C Ludwig
• Zoher Ghogawala

Publication/Presentation Date

4-1-2026

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A national prospective cervical spine surgery registry was developed to archive radiographic studies, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and surgical implant data to assess long-term safety.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the design, development, funding, and implementation of a cervical spine data registry for 1000 patients with myelopathy and radiculopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: While surgery for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy is safe and effective, there is significant practice variation among spine surgeons. While randomized clinical trials (RCTs) can provide high-quality comparative effectiveness data, RCTs lack the ability to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of various surgical procedures and implants among heterogenous real-world patient populations. The CSRS Registry was designed to collect patient demographics, outcomes, radiographic imaging, surgical approach, and implant data for the purpose of conducting high-quality research.

METHODS: Patients with cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy were enrolled in the CSRS National Registry. De-identified patient data, validated PROMs, radiographic data, and implant data were collected from multiple clinical sites across the United States.

RESULTS: One thousand patients [mean age, 58 y; 456 (46%) women] were enrolled, with 31% follow-up at 1 year. Five hundred ninety-two patients were diagnosed with radiculopathy, 252 with myelopathy, and 156 with radiculopathy and myelopathy. Patients had significant improvements in their PROMs after surgery. At 1 year, the mean NDI score improved from 37.2 to 20.9 ( P < 0.001). The mean self-reported P-mJOA score at baseline was 14.2 and improved to 15.2 by 1 year ( P < 0.001). Baseline CSDI score was 23.6 and improved with a 1-year decrease to an average score of 13.6 ( P < 0.001). There was significant improvement in PROMIS-10 Physical Health score from 41.0 to 45.9 (n=311; P < 0.001) at 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: The CSRS Registry has successfully collected clinical outcomes data that is being leveraged for comparative effectiveness research and evaluations of the long-term safety and effectiveness of spinal implants.

Volume

39

Issue

3

First Page

153

Last Page

153

ISSN

2380-0194

Published In/Presented At

Witham, J. M., Sasso, R. C., Mummaneni, P. V., Riew, K. D., Sardar, Z. M., Ray, W. Z., Harrop, J. S., Protopsaltis, T., Cho, S. K., Nassr, A., Vedentam, A., Mesfin, A., Rhee, J. M., Lawrence, B. D., Ludwig, S. C., & Ghogawala, Z. (2026). Design, Development, Funding, and Implementation of the CSRS Registry: A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Cervical Spine Registry. Clinical spine surgery, 39(3), E153–E160. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001833

Disciplines

Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods

PubMedID

40600728

Department(s)

Administration and Leadership

Document Type

Article