Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma using Nester pushable coils versus Onyx: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.
Publication/Presentation Date
1-30-2026
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has been shown to be an efficacious treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH). Liquid or particulate embolic agents are most commonly used, although coil embolization offers proximal vessel occlusions that may provide comparable efficacy. This multicenter propensity score-matched study compares outcomes of MMAE performed with Nester pushable coils versus Onyx.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients that underwent MMAE with either Nester coils or Onyx at two institutions between March 2019 and February 2025. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on patient and hematoma characteristics. Primary outcomes included radiologic improvement or need for surgical rescue. Secondary outcomes included complication rate and procedure time.
RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were included (91 Nester coil, 92 Onyx) with similar baseline characteristics. More patients incurred general anesthesia for Onyx embolization compared with coiling (60.9% vs 15.4%; p
CONCLUSIONS: Embolization using Nester pushable coils yields similar clinical outcomes to Onyx. Pushable coils are safe, efficient, and allow for shorter procedural times, providing an effective, cost-efficient option for cSDH.
ISSN
1759-8486
Published In/Presented At
Ashraf, O., Musmar, B., Fargen, K. M., Medina, A., Yager, B., Salih, M., Wolfe, S. Q., Brown, P., Gooch, R., Tjoumakaris, S. I., Jabbour, P., & Khanna, O. (2026). Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma using Nester pushable coils versus Onyx: a multicenter propensity score-matched analysis. Journal of neurointerventional surgery, jnis-2025-024746. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-024746
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
41617492
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article