Comparison of antiangiogenic activities using paclitaxel (taxol) and docetaxel (taxotere).
Publication/Presentation Date
3-10-2003
Abstract
Tumor growth requires a competent vascular supply and angiogenesis has been considered as a potential target for the treatment of several cancers. The two clinically approved taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, are novel antimitotic agents that are under extensive investigation in clinical trials. Both taxanes have demonstrated significant activity against many solid tumors, but little is known about the effect of paclitaxel and docetaxel on endothelial cell function and angiogenic processes. The purpose of our study was to examine and compare the effects of these drugs on angiogenic processes in vitro and in vivo. These processes include: proliferation, migration and differentiation of cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) (in vitro), capillary sprouting of rat aortic ring explants (ex vivo) and HT1080 tumor growth in vivo. Our results demonstrate that endothelial cells are 10-100-fold more sensitive to these drugs than tumor cells. Additionally, comparison of the taxanes demonstrated that angiogenesis is blocked by both drugs primarily via inhibition of proliferation and differentiation (tube assay) and induction of cell death. Docetaxel, however, appears to be more potent at inhibiting angiogenesis, with an IC(50) concentration 10x less than that of paclitaxel. We conclude that these important findings should be taken in account in clinical trials where tumor angiogenesis is being targeted.
Volume
104
Issue
1
First Page
121
Last Page
129
ISSN
0020-7136
Published In/Presented At
Grant, D. S., Williams, T. L., Zahaczewsky, M., & Dicker, A. P. (2003). Comparison of antiangiogenic activities using paclitaxel (taxol) and docetaxel (taxotere). International journal of cancer, 104(1), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.10907
Disciplines
Business Administration, Management, and Operations | Health and Medical Administration | Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
PubMedID
12532428
Department(s)
Administration and Leadership
Document Type
Article