Clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh free tissue transfer for reconstruction of glossectomy defects.
Publication/Presentation Date
3-1-2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of literature of health-related quality of life endpoints for radial forearm (RF) versus anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap reconstruction for glossectomy defects. Our goal was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of clinical, functional, and quality of life outcomes after glossectomy reconstruction using a RF or ALT flap.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent glossectomy and immediate reconstruction with RF or ALT flaps between 2016 and 2021. Outcomes of interest included readmission and reoperation rates, functional assessments, tracheostomy and gastrostomy tube status, and FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer scores.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients consisting of 54 RF and 24 ALT free flaps were included. ALT patients had a larger median flap size (72 vs. 48 cm
CONCLUSION: The RF and ALT flaps are suitable for glossectomy reconstruction, with minimal differences seen in postoperative outcomes. Our study suggests that ALT can be used in patients with base of tongue and larger defect sizes, while providing similar functional and clinical outcomes to RF reconstruction.
Volume
129
Issue
4
First Page
681
Last Page
690
ISSN
1096-9098
Published In/Presented At
Zhang, K. K., Graziano, F. D., Cohen, Z., Cunningham, L., Ali, B., Coleman-Belin, J., Kim, M., Haglich, K., Cracchiolo, J. R., Matros, E., Shahzad, F., Nelson, J. A., & Allen, R. J., Jr (2024). Clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes of radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh free tissue transfer for reconstruction of glossectomy defects. Journal of surgical oncology, 129(4), 681–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27560
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
38073188
Department(s)
Fellows and Residents
Document Type
Article