Patient Outcomes After Single-level Coflex Interspinous Implants Versus Single-level Laminectomy.
Publication/Presentation Date
7-1-2021
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes of Coflex interspinous device versus laminectomy.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization device (CID) is indicated for one- or two-level lumbar stenosis with grade 1 stable spondylolisthesis in adult patients, as an alternative to laminectomy, or laminectomy and fusion. CID provides stability against progressive spondylolisthesis, retains motion, and prevents further disc space collapse.
METHODS: Patients ≥18 years' old with lumbar stenosis and grade 1 stable spondylolisthesis who underwent either primary single-level decompression and implantation of CID, or single-level laminectomy alone were included with a minimum 90-day follow-up at a single academic institution. Clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were reviewed until the latest follow-up. χ2 and independent samples t tests were used for analysis.
RESULTS: Eighty-three patients (2007-2019) were included: 37 cases of single-level laminectomy (48.6% female) were compared to 46 single-level CID (50% female). CID cohort was older (CID 69.0 ± 9.4 vs. laminectomy 64.2 ± 11.0, P = 0.042) and had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade (CID 2.59 ± 0.73 vs. laminectomy 2.17 ± 0.48, P = 0.020). CID patients had higher estimated blood loss (EBL) (97.50 ± 77.76 vs. 52.84 ± 50.63 mL, P = 0.004), longer operative time (141.91 ± 47.88 vs. 106.81 ± 41.30 minutes, P = 0.001), and longer length of stay (2.0 ± 1.5 vs. 1.1 ± 1.0 days, P = 0.001). Total perioperative complications (21.7% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.035) and instrumentation-related complication was higher in CID (10.9% vs. 0% laminectomy group, P = 0.039). There were no other significant differences between the groups in demographics or outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Single-level CID devices had higher perioperative 90-day complications, longer operative time, length of stay, higher EBL compared to laminectomies alone. Similar overall revision and neurologic complication rates were noted compared to laminectomy at last follow-up.Level of Evidence: 3.
Volume
46
Issue
13
First Page
893
Last Page
900
ISSN
1528-1159
Published In/Presented At
Zhong, J., O'Connell, B., Balouch, E., Stickley, C., Leon, C., O'Malley, N., Protopsaltis, T. S., Kim, Y. H., Maglaras, C., & Buckland, A. J. (2021). Patient Outcomes After Single-level Coflex Interspinous Implants Versus Single-level Laminectomy. Spine, 46(13), 893–900. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003924
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
33395022
Department(s)
Fellows and Residents
Document Type
Article