Value neutrality in genetic counseling: an unattained ideal.

C A Rentmeester

Publication/Presentation Date

1-1-2001

Abstract

Beginning with a discussion of why value neutrality on the part of the genetics counselor does not necessarily preserve autonomy of the counselee, the idea that social values unavoidably underlie the articulation of risks and benefits of genetic testing is made explicit. Despite the best efforts of a counselor to convey "value neutral" facts, risk assessment by the counselee and family is done according to normative analysis, experience with illness, and definitions of health. Each of these factors must be known by the genetic counselor in order to relate those facts which she acknowledges as relevant to the decisions that will be made by those people seeking the genetic information. Concisely, the scope of this paper includes the role of the genetic counselor in facilitating a family planning decision-making process. In the expression of genetic risks, the authority of medical language impacts a person's understanding of epidemiological data. By claiming that "value neutrality" is an ethos of genetic counselors, this implies that there exists a distinction between these scientific facts and personal values; this assumption is fallacious and should not be promoted to patients as a truth within the professional ethos statement of genetic counseling.

Volume

4

Issue

1

First Page

47

Last Page

51

ISSN

1386-7423

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

PubMedID

11315419

Department(s)

Fellows and Residents

Document Type

Article

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS