A trauma expert consensus: Capabilities are required early to improve survivability from traumatic injury.
Publication/Presentation Date
7-12-2024
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mortality reviews examine US military fatalities resulting from traumatic injuries during combat operations. These reviews are essential to the evolution of the military trauma system to improve individual, unit, and system-level trauma care delivery and inform trauma system protocols and guidelines. This study identifies specific prehospital and hospital interventions with the potential to provide survival benefits.
METHODS: US Special Operations Command fatalities with battle injuries deemed potentially survivable (2001-2021) were extracted from previous mortality reviews. A military trauma review panel consisting of trauma surgeons, forensic pathologists, and prehospital and emergency medicine specialists conducted a methodical review to identify prehospital, hospital, and resuscitation interventions (e.g., laparotomy, blood transfusion) with the potential to have provided a survival benefit.
RESULTS: Of 388 US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities, 100 were deemed potentially survivable. Of these (median age, 29 years; all male), 76.0% were injured in Afghanistan, and 75% died prehospital. Gunshot wounds were in 62.0%, followed by blast injury (37%), and blunt force injury (1.0%). Most had a Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale severity classified as 4 (severe) (55.0%) and 5 (critical) (41.0%). The panel recommended 433 interventions (prehospital, 188; hospital, 315). The most recommended prehospital intervention was blood transfusion (95%), followed by finger/tube thoracostomy (47%). The most common hospital recommendations were thoracotomy and definitive vascular repair. Whole blood transfusion was assessed for each fatality: 74% would have required ≥10 U of blood, 20% would have required 5 to 10 U, 1% would have required 1 to 4 U, and 5% would not have required blood products to impact survival. Five may have benefited from a prehospital laparotomy.
CONCLUSION: This study systematically identified capabilities needed to provide a survival benefit and examined interventions needed to inform trauma system efforts along the continuum of care. The determination was that blood transfusion and massive transfusion shortly after traumatic injury would impact survival the most.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Expert Opinion; Level V.
ISSN
2163-0763
Published In/Presented At
Gurney, J. M., Kotwal, R. S., Holcomb, J. B., Staudt, A. M., Eastridge, B., Sirkin, M., Jensen, S., Shackelford, S., Sonka, B. J., Wilson, J., Montgomery, H., Gross, K., Warren, W., Mazuchowski, E., & Rohrer, A. J. (2024). A trauma expert consensus: Capabilities are required early to improve survivability from traumatic injury. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 10.1097/TA.0000000000004414. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004414
Disciplines
Medicine and Health Sciences
PubMedID
38996416
Department(s)
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Document Type
Article